Friday, May 3, 2013

Frack off...Exploring the Cons of Hydraulic Fracturing

In this installment, I will provide common arguments opponents of hydraulic fracturing offer against the natural gas process and again, offer the facts behind them. I once again do not intend to offer information in a biased manner and will do my best to present the material strictly factually. 

Argument: Hydraulic fracturing uses too much water.

Fact: After conducting some research, I found the pie graph below, provided by the joint collaboration of the United States Department of Interior and the U.S. Geological Survey; estimates are current as of 2005, as no new estimates have been released. According to their estimates, mining, oil and gas account for only 1% of the nations water consumption, a relatively small percentage of the overall usage. Additionally, I stumbled across FracFocus whose “primary purpose is to provide factual information concerning hydraulic fracturing and groundwater protection.  It is not intended to argue either for or against the use of hydraulic fracturing as a technology” (http://fracfocus.org/). They state that oil and gas operates are advocating capturing water when the river flow is greatest according to the seasons.



Argument: Hydraulic fracturing contaminates drinking water. 

Fact: The Environmental Protection Agency, as of April 2011, released its intent of research under the Plan to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources. As of September 2012, the EPA has only released its methods of research that includes: analysis of existing data, scenario evaluations, laboratory studies, toxicity assessments, and case studies. Though no results have been reported to the public, the goal of their research is to “to inform the public and provide decision-makers at all levels with high-quality scientific knowledge that can be used in decision-making processes” regarding hydraulic fracturing. Results from this study, which will be available for peer review and comment in 2014, will hopefully offer greater insight into the implications hydraulic fracturing has on drinking water. Just as a side note, in 2004, the EPA released a report with similar aims, to determine if hydraulic fracturing contaminated drinking water, it found no relationship between the two and declared fracking as safe. However, according to OMB, referenced in earlier posts, this report remains controversial as the official on the report suggested it was flawed.
 
Argument: Hydraulic fracturing causes earthquakes.
On this issue, I found mixed results. According to the United States Geological Survey, hydraulic fracturing has the potential to "causes small earthquakes, but they are almost always too small to be a safety concern.” However, the Environmental Protection Agency reported differently that, they have consistently found no relationship between hydraulic fracturing and earthquakes. 


Argument: Hydraulic fracturing and its disclosure laws and trade secrets leave something to be desired. What’s the deal?

Fact: Hydraulic fracturing is federally exempt from the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act, which allows for trade secrets, or lack of complete disclosure of all chemicals used in fracking fluid. This has lead to public distrust regarding the chemicals utilized in the hydraulic fracturing process. However, the FRAC Act, the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act, was introduced to congress in 2009 and reintroduced in March of 2011 and aims to remove this exemption and require full public disclosure of all chemical additives used in the hydraulic fracturing process. However, the bill has not been passed. On the state level, upwards of 100 bills have been introduced also pushing for public disclosure regarding chemical additives. 

About the Fracking fluid itself...
According to FracFocus, ‘fracking fluid’ is typically comprised of 98%-99.2% water and three to twelve chemical additives, utilized for a specific purpose (see graphic below). Specific utilizations of chemicals are “biocides to prevent microorganism growth and to reduce biofouling of the fractures; oxygen scavengers and other stabilizers to prevent corrosion of metal pipes; and acids that are used to remove drilling mud damage within the near‐wellbore area” (http://fracfocus.org/water-protection/drilling-usage). 


For more, click on the link to check out health effects of the known chemicals used in fracking fluid and their use in other products, such as laxatives, electronics, soaps, textiles, and much more. http://www.hcn.org/issues/43.3/unpacking-health-hazards-in-frackings-chemical-cocktail/graphic

No comments:

Post a Comment